Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th May 2011 20:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 472704
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by vivainio
by mrhasbean on Wed 11th May 2011 21:25
in reply to "RE: Comment by vivainio"
RE[3]: Comment by vivainio
by JAlexoid on Wed 11th May 2011 23:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by vivainio"
RE[2]: Comment by vivainio
by Soulbender on Wed 11th May 2011 21:31
in reply to "RE: Comment by vivainio"
Well, that's an odd argument. I mean, isn't the fact that Google is using a *different* approach using *existing* open source code the whole *point* behind open source?
Forking is a large part of FOSS.
But so is upstreaming, the concept of making changes and offering them up to the parent project for inclusion. A few complaints directed at Android have been that it is using a different method for handling 'handoffs' (wakelock), and it's rumoured with 3.1 to have a different USB driver stack to Linux.
This means more work to keep Android in sync with Linux kernels, and that drivers developed for Android devices don't automatically get supported in Linux.
RE[3]: Comment by vivainio
by JAlexoid on Wed 11th May 2011 23:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by vivainio"
A few complaints directed at Android have been that it is using a different method for handling 'handoffs' (wakelock), and it's rumoured with 3.1 to have a different USB driver stack to Linux.
I'm pretty sure it's the same story as with the scheduler - one size fits all is not always the best approach. And you know that if Linus will not think it's right it'll never get in to the mainline.
RE[2]: Comment by vivainio
by vivainio on Thu 12th May 2011 06:01
in reply to "RE: Comment by vivainio"
Well, that's an odd argument. I mean, isn't the fact that Google is using a *different* approach using *existing* open source code the whole *point* behind open source?
I wasn't making any philosophical argument about open source in general - just saying, in very concrete terms, why I don't like Android.



Member since:
2005-06-29
Well, that's an odd argument. I mean, isn't the fact that Google is using a *different* approach using *existing* open source code the whole *point* behind open source?