Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 17th May 2011 12:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 473425
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
But are they implementing anything in their MonoTouch/MonoAndroid offerings which lie outside Microsoft's 'community promise licence'? If not then I don't see what they have to fear legally. Anyway I think it makes perfect sense for Miguel to pursue this as a Mono-specific company rather than as a division of a larger company.
Hopefully they will manage to make enough money from their proprietary Mono offerings to stay afloat and thus be able to continue developing Mono as a cross platform C# solution. While I personally have absolutely no interest in C#/NET, I am impressed with the passion Miguel and his team have been implementing this development platform and I hope that they will have the opportunity to continue doing so.