Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th May 2011 20:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 474129
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As for resource efficient where would you get a reasonable impartial review of AVs?
That I don't know, I would provide one if I could. My opinion is based on my personal experience; I for example just switched a friend's daughter's laptop to MSE from F-Secure and the speedup was quite noticeable. But I understand that just some random person on the Internets isn't the most reliable source -- it's just anecdotal evidence -- and an impartial review on performance of even 5 of the most used AVs would indeed be nice, even just for the sake of curiosity.
I'll try to remember to PM if I come across one, but all the ones I've seen have been paid for behind-the-scenes.. :/




Member since:
2006-02-22
MSE is certainly OK, on Virus Bulletin its been tested 4 times and missed a in the wild virus once http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/vendor?id=70 I use ESET NOD (tested 67 times tailed 3.) So I think time will tell if MSE is good.
As for resource efficient where would you get a reasonable impartial review of AVs? The popular press would have us using McAfee (failed the 4 of the last 5 tests) or Norton. - Well Mac Defender or Norton that would be a tough call