Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sun 29th May 2011 09:42 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes It's funny how trying to have a consistent system design makes you constantly jump from one area of the designed OS to another. I initially just tried to implement interrupt handling, and now I'm cleaning up the design of an RPC-based daemon model, which will be used to implement interrupt handlers, along with most other system services. Anyway, now that I get to something I'm personally satisfied with, I wanted to ask everyone who's interested to check that design and tell me if anything in it sounds like a bad idea to them in the short or long run. That's because this is a core part of this OS' design, and I'm really not interested in core design mistakes emerging in a few years if I can fix them now. Many thanks in advance.
Thread beginning with comment 474964
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Kaj-de-Vos
by Kaj-de-Vos on Sun 29th May 2011 20:30 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Kaj-de-Vos"
Kaj-de-Vos
Member since:
2010-06-09

All the things you talk about are procedure calls. If you never consider the alternative of declarative messaging, you won't see the difference.

Reply Parent Score: 1