Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Jun 2011 22:38 UTC
Internet & Networking Because OSNews is technically a site from the US, and because the technology industry is decidedly a US-centric industry, we often talk about US politics having adverse effects on technology - or, the other way around. That's why I've been detailing the political movements here in The Netherlands with regards to net neutrality. After a lot of positive news, I've now got some bad news - bad news that involves the largest political party trying to block net neutrality - because one of its members of parliament, Afke Schaart, is a former KPN employee. And yes, KPN is the carrier that first announced it was going to block and throttle traffic.
Thread beginning with comment 475626
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Berend de Boer
Member since:
2005-10-19

Oh,? So I can do whatever I want with my PS3 then? Like, I dunno, hack it.


Yes you can.

Oh, you actually can't? And who made that illegal? And what kind of laws are being used to take that right away from you?

A very good example that laws cut both ways, and they're usually not in favour of consumers.

Reply Parent Score: 1

PRaabjerg Member since:
2006-09-23

Er. Are you actually arguing against laws and government in general?
If so, did you have a look at Somalia recently?

Laws are, by definition, the (nanny?) "state stepping in", referring to the root post.

Laws cut both ways, yes. But laws being good or bad depends entirely on the government. There are always stupid laws, and stupid lobbyists. And the system could be better equipped to avoid these lobbyists from interfering with democracy. You have to constantly poke stupid politicians to at least avoid the introduction of the very worst laws. But mostly it works out in favour of "the average guy/gal". The relatively few bad laws you know of are almost certainly outnumbered by the many good laws that keep society stable.

Well. At least here in Sweden. I don't know where you live, so...

Anyway. In my opinion, this particular case falls under "good" regulation that benefits the customer in the apparent absence of competition. And this absence of competition is not purely caused by government stupidity. Do you really think it would be a good idea to let the spectrum be completely unregulated?
Because then I have a unicorn I want to sell you. The mileage is good and it's only been flown by an old lady.

Reply Parent Score: 3