To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Er. Are you actually arguing against laws and government in general?
If so, did you have a look at Somalia recently?
Laws are, by definition, the (nanny?) "state stepping in", referring to the root post.
Laws cut both ways, yes. But laws being good or bad depends entirely on the government. There are always stupid laws, and stupid lobbyists. And the system could be better equipped to avoid these lobbyists from interfering with democracy. You have to constantly poke stupid politicians to at least avoid the introduction of the very worst laws. But mostly it works out in favour of "the average guy/gal". The relatively few bad laws you know of are almost certainly outnumbered by the many good laws that keep society stable.
Well. At least here in Sweden. I don't know where you live, so...
Anyway. In my opinion, this particular case falls under "good" regulation that benefits the customer in the apparent absence of competition. And this absence of competition is not purely caused by government stupidity. Do you really think it would be a good idea to let the spectrum be completely unregulated?
Because then I have a unicorn I want to sell you. The mileage is good and it's only been flown by an old lady.




Member since:
2005-10-19
Yes you can.
Oh, you actually can't? And who made that illegal? And what kind of laws are being used to take that right away from you?
A very good example that laws cut both ways, and they're usually not in favour of consumers.