Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Jun 2011 19:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The UN's definition of a "right" is so comical that you would think the entire system was put into place by teenagers.
The UN can't give you rights any more than it can take them away. The UDHR is so at odds with itself that it is meaningless; the document is riddled with logical fallacies and contradictions.
The only way anyone can have the "right" to housing/internet/medicine/food is by taking away the rights of other people. The whole UN charter exists to enslave populations by picking their pocket with one hand while giving them handouts with the other.
RE[2]: Comment by Luminair
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 5th Jun 2011 16:11
in reply to "RE: Comment by Luminair"
RE[2]: Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Tue 7th Jun 2011 21:34
in reply to "RE: Comment by Luminair"





Member since:
2007-03-30
Some of you are using a different definition of "human right" than the UN. Internet is a big deal, and it fits with what the UN does. The idea is to make life good.