Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jun 2011 18:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 476791
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Right, because if you don't agree with incredible draconian arguments parroted about in the name of "protecting the children" you're a pederast. Right.
Interesting that you didn't actually address the question. I asked you if you were arguing that child pornography is OK, and you skirted around the question without actually answering it. It was a Yes or No question. You didn't give a clear answer.
Can I assume your unwillingness to answer the question directly means that you do think child porn is OK? And that's why you are unwilling to give a simple yes or no answer?
Edited 2011-06-10 15:14 UTC
Shouldn't feed the trolls, but I'm bored. As well you must know, the question isn't if he's ok with child pornography, which I very much doubt, because next to no one is. The question is what fighting child pornography justifies. Your stance appears to be "everything, and if you disagree with me, you must be for child pornography". Which is pretty much a straw man argument.





Member since:
2005-08-18
Right, because if you don't agree with incredible draconian arguments parroted about in the name of "protecting the children" you're a pederast. Right.