Linked by ebasconp on Fri 10th Jun 2011 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 477023
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Meant as a Scala Demonstration
by baderman on Sun 12th Jun 2011 19:29
in reply to "RE[5]: Meant as a Scala Demonstration"
RE[7]: Meant as a Scala Demonstration
by pantheraleo on Sun 12th Jun 2011 21:42
in reply to "RE[6]: Meant as a Scala Demonstration"
Or simply points out, which programmers are in majority here. It's an unfortunate flaw of democracy
.
. Well, again. The server vs. client JVM mode makes a very big difference in performance. And, using a different algorithm, I can produce results where Java is 5x faster than C++. So the points I made were completely valid. Also, given that the test was intended specifically to test Scala, the fact that they didn't rest concurrency at all is kind of mind boggling to me.





Member since:
2007-03-07
Well, considering it got voted up several times, apparently most readers didn't think it was stupid. So maybe that says more about your level of stupidity if you thought it was stupid? Or perhaps it says something about your lack of knowledge of Java, or your lack of knowledge of how real world applications typically behave?