To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
spudley99,
"I'd say a more accurate way of putting it would be that there is a proportion of humanity who are self-centred pricks and who will abuse whatever system is in place.
The trouble is that this proportion, while a minority, are the ones who end up in charge, and able to screw everyone else.
In fact, if everyone was a power hungry self-centred prick, systems like the free market which play on these attributes may actually work a lot better than they do."
Wow, this is extremely insightful.
I've always believed that humanity could do far better for itself if only we'd work together more and ceased using resources actively fighting each other over power/wealth.
At the extreme, we could theoretically automate most of the work humans do today, such that food/shelter/clothing could be provided without human workers. We might only need to work a day/week to pay for extra amenities, with the rest of the time used for leisure/arts/learning/whatever.
Theoretically, there's nothing stopping us from achieving this type of civilization. However, this presupposes that humanity can overcome greed, which maybe it cannot.




Member since:
2009-03-25
Hmm.. I would consider that to be a bit over-cynical.
I'd say a more accurate way of putting it would be that there is a proportion of humanity who are self-centred pricks and who will abuse whatever system is in place.
The trouble is that this proportion, while a minority, are the ones who end up in charge, and able to screw everyone else.
In fact, if everyone was a power hungry self-centred prick, systems like the free market which play on these attributes may actually work a lot better than they do.