"The House on Wednesday took up the most far-reaching overhaul of the patent system in 60 years, a bill that leaders in both parties said would make it easier for inventors to get their innovations to market and help put people back to work. The legislation, supported by the Obama administration and a broad range of business groups and high tech companies, aims to ease the lengthy backlog in patent applications, clean up some of the procedures that can lead to costly litigation and put the United States under the same filing system as the rest of the industrialized world." In other words, more protection for large companies like Google, Apple, and Microsoft, and an increasing number of nonsense patents due to faster application procedures.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2007-09-23
Yes, of course. But how would this change prior art? If I am to understand korrel correctly then it would drastically change this.
If there's one change I want to make to the judicial system in the US it would be this:
Make the looser pay for the winners costs in civil matters.
If you threaten me with your patent and I feel that your patent is bogus I can challenge you and if I win, I won't loose any money, which I shouldn't, because when the patent was declared invalid so was your threat and thus, it shouldn't have costed me anything to call your bluff.
That's the one change I would love to make. Oh, and do I need to tell you that we have it like this in Sweden. I may have a lot to complain about but there are some things that we actually do right. 
Member since:2011-06-24
In the US, it is possible to have the loser pay for the winner's court costs. I don't think it is an automatic ruling, but it is possible.
But that really isn't the big problem. The big issue is that all parties have to get to the end of the court process to find out who the winner and loser are. Getting to the end requires resources. This is actually a common tactic, I think: a big corporation bogs the court process down in an attempt to "wait-out" the opponent who has less money. This turns into classic siege situation: the winner is determined by who has the most resources to intelligently expend.
So, you get threatened with a patent and you feel the patent is bogus; the only way to become the winner in the court room is to go through the whole court process. Yes, you may not end paying anything in the end, but you have to pay for the interim court costs until then (you have to eat as well). Having a guarantee that you will pay nothing out of pocket "in the end" to call someone's bluff is not enough; you actually have to have enough resources to get to the end of the court process. If you don't have the resources to get to the end of the court process, you give up and you lose and get nothing in return. In fact, you get double-screwed: you had to pay for a court process that ultimately netted you nothing except expended resources, and now you have to pay resources to be compliant with a "bogus" patent.
But maybe your system collects no money until the court process is over? A practice like that would help mitigate at least the financial resources required for a court process. There would still be the legal quagmire to swim through which may or may not require non-monetary resources to deal with.
I am also with the camp that is not sure how this new patent system will help. I will have to do a lot more reading to figure that out. However, of this I am sure: if there are any loopholes that allow big and private corporations to push around those with less resources, the system will be no improvement. Whatever benefits come from the system will be swallowed up by the exploitation of the loopholes.
Edited 2011-06-24 16:06 UTC
At an event earlier today, Microsoft unveiled the next Xbox - the third model, but confusingly named Xbox One. The big focus was TV, integrated Kinect, and all the other stuff we all expected to be forced down our throats. I think it took them 25 minutes to actually come to what should be the core of the story: gaming. Nothing groundbreaking in the gaming department, except for how Microsoft intends to handle the used games market and borrowing games from friends: pay up, buddy!
The day has finally come! Jolla has finally announced the launch device for its Sailfish operating system - and by god this is a looker. It's decidedly different from other phones out there, but it has good specifications and carries a relatively reasonably price tag - EUR 399, and it's up for pre-order today, shipping in the fourth quarter of this year.
Why does Google get so much credit in the technology industry? Why, despite the company's many obvious failings, do many geeks and enthusiasts still hold a somewhat positive view on the all-knowing technology giant? A specific talk at Google I/O this week provides the answer.
OSNews is a sponsor of this year's O'Reilly OSCON in Portland, Oregon, USA. A lucky OSNews reader will win a free three-day pass, including two tutorials days. To win the pass, post a comment on this story saying something about Open Source Software or OSCON. We'll pick a winner at random next week. If you don't have an OSNews account, you may email us your entry. Part of the conference is the 9th annual Open Source Awards, and today the 16th is the deadline for nominations. If you'd like to nominate an outstanding open source contributor, do it here. Read on for more information about OSCON. Update: The 20% discount code for OSNews readers is "OSN."
"Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
This is one of those news items that's fun to write, fun to read, fun to comment on, and where no one will be able to say anything unkind. It's all just one big ball of awesome fluffiness. TuneTracker, the BeOS radio automation software, has just released something very special: TuneTracker System 5, the first version designed entirely and specifically for Haiku. In fact, it actually includes Haiku in the software package. Better yet, TuneTracker also unveiled several system-in-a-box products - which have Haiku and TuneTracker pre-installed.
Exactly twenty years ago, a document was published that played a huge role in establishing the web as we know it today. Twenty years later, and this simple and straightforward document is proof of an irrefutable fact: while closed technologies can change markets, open technologies can change the world.Oh multitasking. That staple of computing that got thrown out the window with many modern smartphones. We got some rudimentary thing in its place - but even as multitasking on phone and tablets improves, its user-visible side remains cumbersome. Windows 8 has a neat implementation, and now it's time Android follows in it footsteps.They're here! Whether that excites you or not remains to be seen, but the Galaxy S4, which will most likely become the best selling Android smartphone of the year by a huge margin, has been reviewed by all the major sites, and there's lots of interesting conclusions in there - although I think most of you will get the gist.Nokia has posted its quarterly results for the first quarter of 2013, and just like the quarters that came before, there's not a whole lot of good news in there. The rise in Lumia sales still can't even dream of making up for the sales drop in Symbian phones, and when broken down in versions, the sales figures for Windows Phone 8 Lumias in particular are very disappointing. In North America, Nokia is getting slaughtered.
Member since:
2009-03-19
I thought this was common sense and standard procedure...
The concept you are referring to is called "prior art" and is present in the US also, with the slight caveat that the original inventor has one year from the public demonstration to file for the patent.