Linked by Kaj de Vos on Tue 5th Jul 2011 17:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Nice to see a non-C compiler
by ssokolow on Tue 5th Jul 2011 20:18
in reply to "Nice to see a non-C compiler"
I'm hoping that this "make a restricted subset for the run time, compiled extensions, and/or systems programming" pattern will catch on.
Of course, I'm a Python programmer. That opinion is no big surprise, given that we came up with Pyrex/Cython and PyPy's RPython.
...makes me wonder how close RPython might come to Haskell's elegant implementation of "statically but implicitly typed" if they eventually decide to make RPython into something that's useful as a full-blown systems programming language rather than just a way to write your code so the slow parts can be compiled to native if necessary.
RE[2]: Nice to see a non-C compiler
by pandronic on Tue 5th Jul 2011 20:38
in reply to "RE: Nice to see a non-C compiler"
RE: Nice to see a non-C compiler
by burnttoys on Wed 6th Jul 2011 13:05
in reply to "Nice to see a non-C compiler"





Member since:
2006-05-18
I really don't know a lot about the current state of compilers, but it seems to me that all news are about new C and C++ compilers (aren't there other compiled languages today?). So for people who don't like the C syntax and the C way of doing things I guess this is good news.