To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do you know what always amazed me?
That an "authority" that finds its basis in treason and rebellion (read: US GOVT) then includes in its own laws a proibition on treason. It always seemed to me to be the ultimate expression of hypocricy. Goose.... gander? Pot ... kettle? Why was it OK in 1776 but wrong in 1976?
More in line with your comments... I never understood those who express the belief that the only way to fight scumbags is by following the rules. The rules, by the way, that created the conditions by which the scumbaggery was able to flourish. They make statements like "Well, then, you'e no better than them."
For once and all, allow me to call BULLSH*T on this!!! The diffence is that, left to one's own devices, would one take said actions merely to benefit oneself? Retalition and equalization is NOT the same as an original, unprovoked action. There is no moral parity.
My 2 cents...





Member since:
2005-08-11
Complaining about something, and advocating illegal action against something, are two different things.