Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jul 2011 14:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 479876
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-08-06
There must be some UBER patent somewhere that the Linux foundation or Google can use to "cease and desist" others and basically ensure MAD (mutually assured destruction).
This uber patent should be some very simple but integral part of almost all software like a common UI feature or something.
The patent holder should be incorruptible even by with billion dollar settlement propositions.
We know this can happen. Remember the i4i xml suit.
Microsoft Word was pulled for a short time by the suit from i4i regarding xml in word before Microsoft settled.
In addition, for good measure they should do this with other patents as well by using a small troll company as a front. Like most of them do. Then a counter suit becomes very difficult. Because the troll company don't actually produce anything that infringe on your patents.
And dont feel bad...These companies live by the sword.