Linked by David Adams on Tue 12th Jul 2011 17:56 UTC, submitted by suka
Linux In an interview with the Austrian tech site Google's Chris DiBona talks about the important role Open Source plays inside of Google. He also goes on to explain why "Android is the Linux desktop dream come true".
Thread beginning with comment 480638
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Linux is inferior coded crap
by CodexAthena on Wed 13th Jul 2011 02:37 UTC
Member since:

First of all Linux technically only refers to a kernel but more colloquially refers to an entire Operating System as is usually represented by distros. However, when talking about a 'Linux Desktop' it makes no sense to only use the term Linux as meaning the kernel only. Anyway so Android having a GPL kernel and an Apache 2.0 userland isn't actually Linux in this sense. This is because the Apache 2.0 license is more closely related to the BSD licenses, ISC license, and MIT license. However, if someone managed to merge the FreeBSD userland (BSD licensed) with the Linux kernel would people still call it 'Linux' ? First of all no one would bother because they would just use one of the various *BSDs instead. Truth of the matter is the GPL is flawed and Linux is an inferior coded mess.

The 451 Group's Matt Aslett's research on the rise of permissive licensing in open-source communities points out, GPL licensing has been in relative decline compared to Apache- and MIT-licensed projects.

The reason for this is clear as Dirk Riehle writes:

"Projects that don't choose a permissive license are at a Darwinian disadvantage over those that do because the later can receive contributions from a broader set of enterprises than the former." Not so surprisingly, this holds true even for source code repositories: GitHub has been beating SourceForge, Google Code, and other source code repositories by being even more open."

Openness matters. Even in the land of open-source software, where openness is the default

Linux and the GPL are Communist in nature. This is not a surprise since Richard Stallman is a leftist Jew. He is not a religious Jew but he is ethnically Jewish. The fact that he is atheist is not a surprise since that comes with the territory of being a Communist.

"* Communism was an essentially Jewish phenomenon. Not merely did the Jew Karl Marx develop the ideas, but the founders of the seminal Russian variety were practically all Jews (this is amply documented by Britton (nd)), as were most of the major figures in communism everywhere in the West. Furthermore, the Russian revolution was financed primarily by Jewish bankers in New York, and specifically by Kuhn Loeb & Co, one of whose partners, Jacob Schiff, was said by his son to have spent the then- inconceivable-sum of $20 million for this purpose (see Sutton (1974)). Schiff was apparently acting out of enmity to the tsar, an antisemite, whom he had also attempted to overthrow by financing the Japanese in the Russo- Japanese war of 1906; and from this it is no surprise that the very first law passed by the Bolsheviks when they took power was a law against "antisemitism". Bolshevism was responsible for more than 50 million deaths, many of them caused by the most fiendish tortures. Worldwide, Jewish-inspired communism has been responsible for the deaths of more than 100 million people. "Jewish bolshevism", as it was frequently called in its early days, came close to achieving world hegemony, and -- in its more subtle forms of liberalism and socialism -- may still do so.

* Most Jews are liberals, and Jews have been prime movers in all of the major liberal social phenomena in America (Dershowitz (1997: 269), MacDonald (1998)). For example, Jews were founders of the NAACP and have served almost continuously as its principal directors and legal counsel; Jews founded and dominate the ACLU; most of the major feminists have been Jewish women (eg, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem); the civil rights movement -- including SNCC and Martin Luther King -- was dominated by Jews and/or communists; Jews comprise more than 50% of all appointed positions in the flamingly-liberal Clinton administration; Jewish senators and representatives have been the major forces behind gun control legislation (Schumer, Metzenbaum, Feinstein, etc), and so on virtually ad infinitum. What goes unstated in all this Jewish liberal activity, however, is that, as early as the late 1920s the (Jewish) leaders of international communism seized on the race issue as a means of tearing apart the world center of individual liberty -- and thus their mortal enemy -- America; and the subsequent Jewish/communist promotion of "civil rights" -- a notion which has now spilled over into feminism, gay rights, children's rights and all sorts of other Balkanization schemes to set groups against one another -- has been so successful that many Americans are now talking openly of racial warfare and the breakup of the country (America)"

The founders of Google are also Jewish. I'd say the founders of Google originally chose to use Linux on their servers and stuff for the reasons stated above. However, their practical Jewish financial Capitalist acumen finally triumphed over Communist GPL idealism so they chose the Apache 2.0 license instead which is a smart move.

Desktop Linux is a joke and always has been. the *BSDs are superior to Linux and the *BSDs have already defeated Linux on the Desktop with MacOSX (the core of MacOSX is Darwin which is significantly base of off FreeBSD).

*BSD code quality is of a higher quality than Linux. It is not hard to understand why. Communism (the GPL etc..) doesn't work. The reason why Communism doesn't work is because Communism tries to repeal a law of nature namely that people work for reward and the more reward they get the harder they work. Getting added code folded back into your project via the GPL isn't a tangible enough reward compared to money for instance. This is because financial currency is happiness in the abstract that can get you pretty much anything you want if you have enough of it. Forced added code folded back into the tree is to ethereal and is also not a good incentive. It is obvious that the Communist slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs)" has more to do with the GPL than does 'working for reward and working harder the more one is rewarded'.

I am aware that some Linux (referring to the userland and kernel) coders are paid to code for Linux but they are in the minority and it is obvious that companies who pay employees to code under the GPL are stupid as pointed out by Dirk Riehle and supported by Aslett's research.

There is nothing magical about Linux. Google's success isn't based on Linux. I mean Yahoo uses FreeBSD. Google as successful today or even more so if they chose NetBSD as Android and ChromeOS's base and if they chose FreeBSD for their servers and OpenBSD for their firewalls and routers etc.. The vast majority of people who use the google search engine probably don't even know or care that the servers run Linux.

Google's founders chose Linux because they are Jews who are sympathetic to their fellow Communist Jew Richard Stallman and Communism and liberalism in general.

I also have no idea why the Linuxtards here are celebrating Android as the representative Linux Desktop either. Google is just as evil as Microsoft it not more in their own way :

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says Facebook, Google, and Yahoo (partially owned by Microsoft) are actually tools for the U.S. intelligence community. In otherwords they are all spy machines who care nothing for your privacy. Microsoft isn't anti-opensource. For instance Microsoft has no ill will towards the *BSD community at all.

Also I might add that Julian Assange used to be part of the *BSD community (at least NetBSD) not the Linux community. That is because only losers use Linux since it is an operating system with inferior insecure code.

*BSD is the way so pick one : FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD or MacOSX etc.. Linux is is for Bitches and dumb ones at that.

Reply Score: -6

CodexAthena Member since:

"...Google's success isn't based on Linux. I mean Yahoo uses FreeBSD. Google as successful today or even more so if they chose NetBSD as Android and ChromeOS's base and if they chose FreeBSD for their servers and OpenBSD for their firewalls and routers etc.. The vast majority of people who use the google search engine probably don't even know or care that the servers run Linux. "

This above should have been this instead :

..Google's success isn't based on Linux. I mean Yahoo uses FreeBSD. Google could be just as successful today or even more so if they chose NetBSD as Android and ChromeOS's base and if they chose FreeBSD for their servers and OpenBSD for their firewalls and routers etc.. The vast majority of people who use the google search engine probably don't even know or care that the servers run Linux.

Sorry for the mistake. Anyway I'm done posting on the internet today. Goodbye !

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE: Linux is inferior coded crap
by shmerl on Wed 13th Jul 2011 04:48 in reply to "Linux is inferior coded crap"
shmerl Member since:

All this blah blah about all communists being Jews is just rubbish. You have also mistaken communism with anarchism (Stallman is rather technological anarchist, than communist), but it's an off-topic to a big degree in this thread. Go and learn the subject and stop trolling.

Edited 2011-07-13 04:52 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

Christian Paratschek Member since:

I've actually read the whole comment because from time to time, I just want to know how the brains of these dipshits really work.

The funniest thing about it: as an Austrian, I hear the exact same story about jews from our right-wing extremists too. But they connect the Jews with CAPITALISM instead of communism! They talk about Jews dominating the World Economy trying to destroy hard-working Germans.

As you can see, you can spin the story however you want.

Man, it seems to be so easy to live in a bubble where you just blame someone else for failing in your own life. You're a loser, man. You can't compete with other people on merit. And deep inside you KNOW that. But you just can't admit it and try to work harder and be a better person. So all you've left is pointer fingers at others.

You're a loser. You take the blue pill every day and stay in your little fantasy. You wouldn't dare touching the red pill - because you could not persevere the consequences.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Neolander Member since:

For a long time, I hesitated : troll, off-topic, or inaccurate, which one should I choose in that case ?

The intervention of jews, communism, and fake laws of nature (money has been proven by several psychology studies not to work as a reward for intellectual jobs) helped me decide, though.

Edited 2011-07-13 07:36 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

PhilPotter Member since:

I'm sorry, but this is absolute nonsense. You make yourself look ridiculous with your Jewish conspiracy theories, and frankly they disgust me (I might add I'm not Jewish before you claim I am, as per typical right-wing tactics).

Various companies choosing Linux or *BSD or whatever else has many reasons behind it, but the religions/ethnic backgrounds and political ideals of developers...really?? I mean come on - read what you've written - it's just laughable. You really think Larry Page and Sergey Brin sat there and thought "Nowww, what OS shall we use to start our global search empire? It's gotta be by someone Jewish or it's no good!"?

Do me a favour and go get a clue.

Reply Parent Score: 3

olefiver Member since:

Thank you for the most fun read I've had all day.

I especially liked how you equated communism and liberalism as two sides of the same evil Jewish coin.
And keep on blaming the Jews; seeing how long and by how many the Jews have been prosecuted throughout history, they must have done something bad, right?

I hope that you'll write a follow up post though, as I don't see any real evidence or sensible argument in favor of your claim that "the GPL is flawed and Linux is an inferior coded mess".

Until then, I'll continue to be a dumb bitch and use Linux.

Reply Parent Score: 2