Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Aug 2011 21:38 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y The Google-Microsoft patent war of words is continuing. Yesterday, Google (rightfully so, in my book) accused Apple, Microsoft, and Oracle partaking in an organised patent attack against Android, instead of competing on merit, claiming that they bought up Novell's and Nortel's patents solely to attack Android and its device makers. Microsoft struck back, claiming Google was offered to join in on the bids for the Novell patents, but rejected the offer. Google has now responded to this accusation - and to make matters even more confusing, Microsoft responded back. A public shouting match between two powerful parties? Count me in!
Thread beginning with comment 483770
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by kovacm
by kovacm on Fri 5th Aug 2011 04:33 UTC
Member since:

My cheering for Google is based on the company's dislike for software patents

A rather weak response, since if history is anything to go by, the safe assumption is that Google is not going to use any patents aggressively.

...because they do not have ammunition ;)

as far I am concern - end of story! good luck Google ;)

Reply Score: 0

RE: Comment by kovacm
by MOS6510 on Fri 5th Aug 2011 07:44 in reply to "Comment by kovacm"
MOS6510 Member since:

They need "defensive" patents, because they know they are (willingly) infringing a number.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by kovacm
by ichi on Fri 5th Aug 2011 08:56 in reply to "RE: Comment by kovacm"
ichi Member since:

They need "defensive" patents, because they know they are (willingly) infringing a number.

You say that as if it was an evil thing, when reality is you just can't write any piece of software without stepping on someone else's toes. Everything that can be patented has quite likely been patented (and then some just in case), there's a whole business based on trading in patents parasitizing software development.

If you are a small developer you can try flying under the radar of most patent owners, but big companies need the patents to get better deals through cross licensing (ie. deals that don't kill their own products) or just give a "if you mess with me I'll ass-rape you with my patent portfolio" stance.

It's the exact same reason why you'd want a nuclear arsenal.

Reply Parent Score: 5