Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Aug 2011 17:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 484458
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, that's fairly idiotic logic. Apple is one of the top selling PC brands in the market. In fact, they seem to OWN the $1000+ segment. That would hardly make them a failure. Try again.
No. Your arguement would only make sense if Apple didn't have the monopoly over Mac OS X, and there were dozens of brands offering (legal) Mac OS X compatible computers. The Windows-based PC market is very segregated because people can choose. So it is your logic the one that is idiotic.
Anyway, by Sabon's logic, it's pretty obvious that there must have been something lacking on Mac OS-based computers since they were nowhere nearly as successful as Windows (the "Mac OS rip-off" Apple Fanboys have been complaining about for ages) based ones.
Oh, and if you like so much to filter data to suit your beliefs, how about this: Apple also OWNS the named-after-a-fruit PC segment.
No. Your arguement would only make sense if Apple didn't have the monopoly over Mac OS X, and there were dozens of brands offering (legal) Mac OS X compatible computers. The Windows-based PC market is very segregated because people can choose. So it is your logic the one that is idiotic.
This is illogical yet again. The iPhone is the #1 selling smartphone. Should it be discounted because Apple has a "monopoly" over iOS? Yes, the iPhone is SUCH a failure. lol
Since you talk of people that "filter data to suit" you certainly display a run-away knack for it. There is nothing wrong with comparing hardware brand against hardware brand.
Anyway, by Sabon's logic, it's pretty obvious that there must have been something lacking on Mac OS-based computers since they were nowhere nearly as successful as Windows (the "Mac OS rip-off" Apple Fanboys have been complaining about for ages) based ones.
...and yet Apple is just as successful as other hardware makers.
Oh, and if you like so much to filter data to suit your beliefs, how about this: Apple also OWNS the named-after-a-fruit PC segment.
The fact that I mentioned Apple owning the high-end PC market is not selective filtering, it's merely pointing to the fact of how successful they have been and with a healthy markup to boot.
Edited 2011-08-11 02:03 UTC
"Sorry, Chuckles, but that reasoning also applies to all of the accusations that iFanboys have directed at Microsoft over the years. Clearly something was lacking in MacOS (and Apple computers in general), given that they're an abject failure in the market compared to Windows-based PCs.
No, that's fairly idiotic logic. "
Which was exactly my point, bravo on completely missing it.
Apple is one of the top selling PC brands in the market. In fact, they seem to OWN the $1000+ segment. That would hardly make them a failure. Try again.
The only way to not see Apple's computing products as a failure is to use dishonest comparisons that are rigged to make Apple look better, like comparing an entire platform (Macs + OS X) to a single vendor like Dell or Acer.
The reality is that Macs, as a platform, don't compete against individual PC OEMs, Apple's desktop computing platform "competes" (and I use that term in the loosest possible sense) with Microsoft's desktop computing platform... and by every objective measure out there is, Apple's platform is a laughable failure compared to Microsoft's. Sorry, you don't get to gloss over that minor detail, just because Apple's platform is at disadvantage due to its single-vendor limitations (especially since that disadvantage is solely due to deliberate decisions on Apple's part).
Apple's profits even before the whole iphone/ipad thing begs to differ. I don't know about you but if I'm making money hand over fist with less effort and less product than my competitor who has to basically go broke to earn the same amount as me, I think that's a win for me.
The only way you can look at Apple as failure is if you ignore how much money they make on their product selling less on their part. So yeah, Apple sells much less that Acer, HP, and Dell, yet they are the biggest tech company in the world at this moment, that with only barely 10% market penetration. Who's the real winner?





Member since:
2005-08-12
No, that's fairly idiotic logic. Apple is one of the top selling PC brands in the market. In fact, they seem to OWN the $1000+ segment. That would hardly make them a failure. Try again.