Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Aug 2011 09:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 484876
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 13th Aug 2011 18:44
in reply to "RE[2]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all"
They may not have outright lied but their statement clearly implied they had no knowledge of this proceeding at all and that's just not true.
They had no knowledge of the injunction being filed. There is no evidence that they did. Just because they took a preventive measure which is entirely logical considering the anti-competitive tactics Apple has been going for does NOT mean they knew about the injunction. Anticipating a legal action might come != knowing about that specific legal action - just like how insuring your car does not mean you know about that specific accident you're going to have in 3 years' time.
RE[4]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all
by Morgan on Sun 14th Aug 2011 01:25
in reply to "RE[3]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all"
just like how insuring your car does not mean you know about that specific accident you're going to have in 3 years' time.
That's pretty much how I'm reading it. It's pretty common here in the States for a corporate law firm to take such preventive action, especially in the realm of patents and sensitive corporate info. I figured that was common knowledge; it's certainly not illegal or immoral.
RE[3]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all
by JAlexoid on Sun 14th Aug 2011 21:30
in reply to "RE[2]: LOL. Samsung deceived you all"
They may not have outright lied but their statement clearly implied they had no knowledge of this proceeding at all and that's just not true.
Now imagine if your insurance company took that same stance in a case of not paying out your claim. Because you had bought the insurance means you had knowledge of an event that would result in a claim. You would probably be all in rage...
In fact, many insurance claims have been disputed based on those grounds. Taking out an insurance policy right before some event.




Member since:
2006-01-01
They may not have outright lied but their statement clearly implied they had no knowledge of this proceeding at all and that's just not true.
It's not like the German court in question invented this process or that it was arcane or whatever (you yourself state this particular court handles many such cases).
Apple followed the law, Samsung followed the law, and the German court sided with Apple. You may not agree with this decision or the law in general but the law is the law.
It's lame PR move by Samsung and it's not going to endear them to the court in question by any means so it's a pretty bad move on their part.