Linked by David Adams on Sat 20th Aug 2011 15:38 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Thread beginning with comment 486141
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by binarycrusader on Sun 21st Aug 2011 02:27
in reply to "RE: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
It's had a positive response over all actually and Redhat have been behind it a lot.
I wish Linux users would stop bashing DEs lately, it's really boring. Don't like KDE4, don't like GNOME Shell, oh 2 year later, oh it's not bad actually, I like it. It's the same old story, new DE comes out, some Linux user doesn't like it and uses another DE or asks to fork it.
I wish Linux users would stop bashing DEs lately, it's really boring. Don't like KDE4, don't like GNOME Shell, oh 2 year later, oh it's not bad actually, I like it. It's the same old story, new DE comes out, some Linux user doesn't like it and uses another DE or asks to fork it.
Maybe some people are like that, but I'm not.
I've used GNOME since the early 1.x days and I've felt it's got progressively worse, yes, even with 2.x.
I don't use KDE either.
I only tolerate GNOME 2.x because it's what's installed on my workstation and I spend most of my time in a terminal window.
Besides, when Linus Torvalds himself says it's a pile of crap, perhaps it's time to listen...
Edited 2011-08-21 02:27 UTC
RE[3]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by thebluesgnr on Sun 21st Aug 2011 03:45
in reply to "RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
RE[3]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by WereCatf on Sun 21st Aug 2011 06:38
in reply to "RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
I've used GNOME since the early 1.x days and I've felt it's got progressively worse, yes, even with 2.x.
I actually liked GNOME 2.x myself a lot. I tried different DEs every now and then out of boredom and curiosity and still always came back.
Besides, when Linus Torvalds himself says it's a pile of crap, perhaps it's time to listen...
Adopting another person's opinion instead of making your own one, just because the other person is famous, is foolish.
RE[3]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by Delgarde on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 01:42
in reply to "RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
RE[3]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by SlackerJack on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 16:18
in reply to "RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
RE[3]: That certainly explains GNOME 3
by tidux on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 13:23
in reply to "RE[2]: That certainly explains GNOME 3"
KDE 4.6 is really, really nice. It's a lot faster than 4.4 on equivalent hardware, they have a native Gtk Oxygen theme that finally makes all your applications look the same, and Activities is finally starting to make some sense. I've used GNOME and KDE both since *buntu 8.04, and KDE 4.6 is better than GNOME 2 will ever be at this point. I haven't tried GNOME 3 yet, and I don't know if I ever will, but that doesn't mean it's universally crap.





Member since:
2005-11-12
It's had a positive response over all actually and Redhat have been behind it a lot.
I wish Linux users would stop bashing DEs lately, it's really boring. Don't like KDE4, don't like GNOME Shell, oh 2 year later, oh it's not bad actually, I like it. It's the same old story, new DE comes out, some Linux user doesn't like it and uses another DE or asks to fork it.
I think Linux desktop is a dead horse and has been flogged so many times, even Microsoft are looking to the Cloud and web applications are not some bubble waiting to pop I don't think.