Linked by David Adams on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 23:03 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux Would you believe that ARM processors, those little chips that power so many smartphones and tablets, have a future on servers? Ubuntu does.
Thread beginning with comment 486433
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Which is more important?
by Thomas2005 on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 13:27 UTC
Member since:

Getting a 64-bit processor at current speeds and number of cores, or getting current processors running at 3+GHz? As far as 32-bit processors only being able to access 4GB RAM, I believe ARM has found a way to address the problem without it being "hackish".

Since ARM processors are customized for specific devices, it would help if a generic model would be released so we could buy it and build our own ARM-based desktops, and/or buy laptops with ARM processors in them. Windows, I believe, is what has kept this from happening, at least indirectly. If you take all the people that use Linux/*BSD, I bet the vast majority of them multi-boot with Windows so you will have that many less customers. Hopefully, this will change when Windows 8 is released.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Which is more important?
by TechGeek on Tue 23rd Aug 2011 17:58 in reply to "Which is more important?"
TechGeek Member since:

actually, ARM is pretty generic. The extras in our devices come to deliver video decoding, 3d accelerated graphics, and such. Those aren't really the type of things you would need on a server platform.

Reply Parent Score: 3