Linked by umad on Thu 25th Aug 2011 22:51 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 486987
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Wait a minute...
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 26th Aug 2011 07:47
in reply to "RE: Wait a minute..."
RE[3]: Wait a minute...
by apoclypse on Fri 26th Aug 2011 13:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Wait a minute..."
So why did you let it get posted? Its your site I think you would want to protect your image and reputation and not let people post stuff you think is subpar. Instead of posting snarky comments on the side how about you just remove the article or something.
I'm assuming you are the editor of this site. The responsibility falls on your shoulders.
RE[3]: Wait a minute...
by molnarcs on Fri 26th Aug 2011 14:14
in reply to "RE[2]: Wait a minute..."
"I am not sure why this is included in the article, but I suspect the article is fan-fiction.
Considering the author, we're lucky it's this mild. "
So tell us, Thom, whose clone is the author

Member since:
2005-09-08
This smells of second-hand information among Apple fanboys. Microsoft was convicted of using Apple code. It was video-for-windows which contained Quicktime code. So there is a grain of truth, but the conclusion is still non sequitur.
I am not sure why this is included in the article, but I suspect the article is fan-fiction.