To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What kind of fanboy response is this? Microsoft could behave better. So could Apple. Poor behavior by Apple does not excuse poor behavior by Microsoft.
I fail to see the relevance of anything that Apple does to Microsoft's attempt to use an avoidable side-effect of a desirable security feature to lock out other operating systems.
Apple plays the lock-in game, too. That doesn't make what Microsoft is doing right. Apple and Microsoft are both wrong. Is that hard to understand?
Yes it was better. EFI is technologically superior to ancient BIOS and closer to the OpenFirmware that apple used on PowerPC. Alternative OSs may have had to adapt to EFI, but they were not locked out of it with keys.
I would not mind the security enhancement in UEFI as long as the user gets a key to run their own code.
If vendors don't offer a way to turn off the feature, SecureBoot will be a prime target for cracking since it will thoroughly irritate people who have the skills and motivation to break it.
Macs don't require the use secure boot, do they? They prevent the OS from booting on non Apple hardware, but that's different: its limiting the use of their software. Microsoft limits the use of the hardware that works with their software. I think Microsoft's is much worse. Software is usually cheaper than hardware.





Member since:
2005-07-08
The only way around this is to create enough vocal complaints against this, that will force Microsoft to change Windows 8 logo requirements.
OEM will be faithfull to themselves and deliver Windows 8 only motherboards.
Another way is to boycott all manufacturs that do such thing.
Somehow Apple is looking good again to me. At least one Apple sale is a Microsoft lost one.