Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Windows The story about how secure boot for Windows 8, part of UEFI, will hinder the use of non-signed binaries and operating systems, like Linux, has registered at Redmond as well. The company posted about it on the Building Windows 8 blog - but didn't take any of the worries away. In fact, Red Hat's Matthew Garrett, who originally broke this story, has some more information - worst of which is that Red Hat has received confirmation from hardware vendors that some of them will not allow you to disable secure boot.
Thread beginning with comment 490852
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Sign your code
by lemur2 on Mon 26th Sep 2011 23:52 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Sign your code"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

Yet another GPL/RMS fail. You can't even sign compiled GPL code? Wow. There comes a time when a license is too restrictive to be of use. Instead of Linux fanboys demanding that everyone else live within the restrictions of RMS/GPL religion, why not dump GPL and pick a different OSI-approved open source license?


An opposing (and rational) viewpoint from Ross Anderson, security engineering professor at Cambridge University, can be read here:

http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2011/09/20/trusted-computing-2-0...

"The extension of Microsoft’s OS monopoly to hardware would be a disaster, with increased lock-in, decreased consumer choice and lack of space to innovate. It is clearly unlawful and must not succeed."


Edited 2011-09-26 23:56 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2