Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Sep 2011 15:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 491062
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: you make them sound irrational
by umad on Wed 28th Sep 2011 19:48
in reply to "RE: you make them sound irrational"
No company that uses, produces and promotes OSS has its assets as the core of the business.
Apple, the richest company in the world produces and promotes OSS and has its assets as the core of their business
The companies that do, usually go out of business. That's so repeatable that's nearly a rule.
You're right that its true most of the time.
RE[3]: you make them sound irrational
by JAlexoid on Wed 28th Sep 2011 21:52
in reply to "RE[2]: you make them sound irrational"
Apple, the richest company in the world produces and promotes OSS and has its assets as the core of their business
No they don't. iOS kernel is not opensource, the ARM port of XNU was never opensourced. Their proprietary graphics stack is very much closed source. The things that make them different are proprietary.




Member since:
2005-09-01
No company that uses, produces or promotes OSS, has OSS assets as the core of the business.
The companies that do, usually go out of business.
That's so repeatable, that's nearly a rule.
RMS can go to great lenghts preaching about selling GPL'd software, but the fact is OSS is like photography; it helps selling other stuff.
Edited 2011-09-28 19:48 UTC