Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Sep 2011 19:45 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 491106
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: There is a plan to improve extensions
by lemur2 on Thu 29th Sep 2011 01:39
in reply to "RE[3]: There is a plan to improve extensions"
To be fair, most of the issues with incompatibilities are with addons not hosted by Mozilla. Those 97-99% rates go way down in the real world. Of course, extensions like the ones Java, Microsoft, and others add usually aren't very useful anyway.
You have no support for this claim.
To be fair, "Compatibility-breaking changes in Firefox have been minimal in the first four 6-week development cycles".
To be fair, 99% of a large sample set of typical add-ons are found to be compatible (and marked as such via a simple automated process).
To be fair, all that is normally required to make an add-on which is not hosted by Mozilla compatible is to mark it as such by updating the compatibility data contained with the add-on.
Edited 2011-09-29 01:47 UTC




Member since:
2005-10-13
To be fair, most of the issues with incompatibilities are with addons not hosted by Mozilla. Those 97-99% rates go way down in the real world.
Of course, extensions like the ones Java, Microsoft, and others add usually aren't very useful anyway.