Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 491287
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The fact that very often there are several Linux desktop applications for any given purpose that are all better than the best application for the same purpose on Windows doesn't really help all that much.
I'd very much like to live in your fantasy-land, but I've yet to come across a Linux desktop app that's better than the best Windows counterpart. All I see are several half-hearted clones.
" The fact that very often there are several Linux desktop applications for any given purpose that are all better than the best application for the same purpose on Windows doesn't really help all that much.
I'd very much like to live in your fantasy-land, but I've yet to come across a Linux desktop app that's better than the best Windows counterpart. All I see are several half-hearted clones. " None of the applications on my list has any code whatsoever in common with a predecessor Windows application. There has been no cloning here.
In order to establish your claim, you need to start by naming one Windows-only app, of a similar scope and purpose as any on my list, that is arguably better than the app on my list. Then we can perhaps look at the possibility that you may have a point.
Before you do that, however, you are only blowing hot air.





Member since:
2007-02-17
Agreed. For a given application type, we only need one desktop application for Linux to be better than the alternatives for Windows in order to have a Linux desktop application that is best-of-breed.
The fact that very often there are several Linux desktop applications for any given purpose that are all better than the best application for the same purpose on Windows doesn't really help all that much.
Edited 2011-09-30 06:06 UTC