Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Oct 2011 21:33 UTC, submitted by mahmudinashar
Thread beginning with comment 493189
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't get it when people say KDE is resource hungry and slow, WTF are you people running it on a 486?
On a half way newer PC it runs extremely well and the hardware acceleration/desktop effects have a built in feel where as Gnome with compiz feel like it's been tacked on and hackish.
On a half way newer PC it runs extremely well and the hardware acceleration/desktop effects have a built in feel where as Gnome with compiz feel like it's been tacked on and hackish.
I am having the same experience, and it is apparent that most other people mare too. Where it is working properly, KDE (in and of itself) works very very well indeed.
However, it is equally clear that some hardware/driver combinations do not support KDE well at all. Some people are indeed, apparently, having a poor experience. There is clearly more work to be done for some hardware configurations.
Edited 2011-10-16 07:53 UTC




Member since:
2007-03-06
I don't get it when people say KDE is resource hungry and slow, WTF are you people running it on a 486?
On a half way newer PC it runs extremely well and the hardware acceleration/desktop effects have a built in feel where as Gnome with compiz feel like it's been tacked on and hackish.
If you don't like unity, don't use there are lots of other options and some are actually better than gnome.