Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Oct 2011 23:17 UTC, submitted by jello
Thread beginning with comment 493757
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Pirates of Silicon Valley - not just source
by jabbotts on Mon 24th Oct 2011 16:49
in reply to "RE[5]: Pirates of Silicon Valley"
It's not just about hording source, then releasing it, then potentially re-licensing it under closed terms. I think it's more about the "open source for vendors not end users" part; where the manufacturers create fragmented child distributions through one-off modifications while still claiming to be the original distribution.
One can never make everyone happy but even if they standardized the distribution stack and allowed manufactures to include there own hardware driver bundles it'd be better. A clean standard core distribution and centralized updates plus a manufacturer/device specific little driver bundle update from time to time.. worlds better.
(Then we just need the Nokia N0 hardware.
)
Edited 2011-10-24 16:50 UTC
RE[7]: Pirates of Silicon Valley - not just source
by frderi on Mon 24th Oct 2011 23:04
in reply to "RE[6]: Pirates of Silicon Valley - not just source"





Member since:
2011-04-25
The problem people have with Google's "open source" policy is apparently they can take it close sourced to behave like a proprietary development house and rush development they need to rapidly add based on competition, and then they can take their time cleaning it up, and then, presumably, they can "close source" it again at any point if they can rationalize it (needed to add features, support a device, speed development) -- and the Google advocates will do the apologizing for them.