Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Oct 2011 23:17 UTC, submitted by jello
Thread beginning with comment 493763
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Jennimc
by frderi on Sun 23rd Oct 2011 11:10
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Jennimc"
I was very much around.
Microsoft saw the NetScape threat - The threat that the web would dethrone Microsoft's dominance in the PC computer market by supplanting Win32 dominance with something they couldn't control; thus they assembled large teams to outgun NetScape's efforts. Once NetScape went belly-up and the threat was gone, they allowed IE to linger. The rest is history.
RE[8]: Comment by Jennimc
by Hussein on Mon 24th Oct 2011 09:47
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Jennimc"
Spoken like a true Microsoft shill. Yeah, it has nothing to do with Microsoft's anti-competitive business practices. The whole trial was a mistake. http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm
RE[9]: Comment by Jennimc
by smashIt on Mon 24th Oct 2011 11:41
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by Jennimc"





Member since:
2005-06-29
Gosh, you weren't around when IE achieved its dominance, were you?
IE achieved dominance because it was better than Netscape. Netscape became stagnant, IE surpassed it - in the same way Firefox surpassed IE when the latter became stagnant.