Linked by snydeq on Tue 8th Nov 2011 01:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 496470
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: I agree, 10 years ago.
by tuma324 on Tue 8th Nov 2011 17:43
in reply to "RE[5]: I agree, 10 years ago."
This is a fantasy. Take javascript frameworks for example. Most of them are either dual licensed or under a permissive license.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
If the GPL were superior, everyone would be using ExtJs instead of jQuery, Prototype, Dojo, Yahoo UI, ...
How about web servers? The number one web server on the planet is Apache HTTPD. That is not under the GPL.
Databases? Ignoring commercial (only) products, several of the major databases are under the GPL but there's also Postgres which is doing rather well under the BSD license.
DNS Servers.. last I checked BIND wasn't under the GPL.
X servers.. oh wait that's MIT licensed.
The GPL is really popular, but if you consider how many things linux would not have without other licenses, it's clear that many viable projects do exist under other licenses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
If the GPL were superior, everyone would be using ExtJs instead of jQuery, Prototype, Dojo, Yahoo UI, ...
How about web servers? The number one web server on the planet is Apache HTTPD. That is not under the GPL.
Databases? Ignoring commercial (only) products, several of the major databases are under the GPL but there's also Postgres which is doing rather well under the BSD license.
DNS Servers.. last I checked BIND wasn't under the GPL.
X servers.. oh wait that's MIT licensed.
The GPL is really popular, but if you consider how many things linux would not have without other licenses, it's clear that many viable projects do exist under other licenses.
jQuery is dual licensed (GPL or MIT). Check Wikipedia.
BIND is licensed under ISC license, which happens to be GPL compatible.
Good luck choosing a license that isn't GPL compatible.
Edited 2011-11-08 17:44 UTC
RE[7]: I agree, 10 years ago.
by laffer1 on Tue 8th Nov 2011 18:05
in reply to "RE[6]: I agree, 10 years ago."




Member since:
2007-11-09
This is a fantasy. Take javascript frameworks for example. Most of them are either dual licensed or under a permissive license.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
If the GPL were superior, everyone would be using ExtJs instead of jQuery, Prototype, Dojo, Yahoo UI, ...
How about web servers? The number one web server on the planet is Apache HTTPD. That is not under the GPL.
Databases? Ignoring commercial (only) products, several of the major databases are under the GPL but there's also Postgres which is doing rather well under the BSD license.
DNS Servers.. last I checked BIND wasn't under the GPL.
X servers.. oh wait that's MIT licensed.
The GPL is really popular, but if you consider how many things linux would not have without other licenses, it's clear that many viable projects do exist under other licenses.