Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 22nd Oct 2005 03:07 UTC, submitted by carbon-12
Thread beginning with comment 49742
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
And now, as we are getting near to the point for their work becomes irrelevant, if its not already, they decide Wine is at beta level. This should serve as a lesson for all of us on what on not to do in software development: minimize copying and maximize new work...
Wow...this shows a complete lack of understanding anything. The problem with Linux is NOT that we need Win32 compatability. The problem is convincing people they don't have to break compatability with their old software to move over. It doesn't matter if Windows Vista comes out tomorrow.
The strenght of wine is that now when you tell a business to come over to linux, we can run some of their old software until they build/buy a new native linux tools while dropping MS. I mean if you had any idea how massive the Win32 api really is you wouldn't be talking. Add in years of fixing broken functions while hacking in workaround for specific apps who are EXPECTING the broken functionality even after it's fixed and you have a really big project. Seriously, if you're not a programmer don't talk about development you sound like an idiot.