Linked by David Adams on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:37 UTC, submitted by rhyder
Thread beginning with comment 499845
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Stick with CDR limitations ...
by zima on Sun 18th Dec 2011 23:54
in reply to "RE: Stick with CDR limitations ..."
most Linux distro maintainers steer towards a works-for-most-people concept, the more bloat you get. Ironically, they're doing the exact same thing they cry about Microsoft doing
Not at all the same thing, software on Linux distros is virtually exclusively from 3rd parties (quite unlike what MS does)




Member since:
2011-08-08
The CDR places a clear limit on the size of the OS. As soon as you start placing arbitrary limits on the size, it become far to easy to say, "but it's only a few megabytes over." That leads down a path of bloat.
Linux bloat is nothing new. The most Linux distro maintainers steer towards a works-for-most-people concept, the more bloat you get. Ironically, they're doing the exact same thing they cry about Microsoft doing.
At any rate, end-user usability is most important -- not filesize.
That may be a problem some a small handful of users but certainly not for the majority. If the expensive of downloading for those people is too great, they should elect to have it mailed to them.
That's an over-exaggeration imo. Distros that install everything by default are simply trying to provide the best user experience by giving him a good amount of software/drivers/etc. to work with. That is not authoritarian.