Linked by David Adams on Tue 13th Dec 2011 03:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 499974
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by cyrilleberger
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 13th Dec 2011 15:56
in reply to "Comment by cyrilleberger"
RE[2]: Comment by cyrilleberger - curation
by jabbotts on Tue 13th Dec 2011 18:24
in reply to "RE: Comment by cyrilleberger"
I could bare to see a little more curation under Google's watch though. Apple's heavy handed marketing vetting and lacking security vetting is too much but Google's cavaleer "upload keys to the kingdom" aproach is far too unregulated given the amount of malware being pumped into repositories. Something closer to how Maemo repositories where managed would due; software was not blocked in the basis of competing with a Nokia/Maemo build function bit it did have to wait in the development repository until proven stable and unmalicious.
RE: Comment by cyrilleberger
by David on Tue 13th Dec 2011 22:23
in reply to "Comment by cyrilleberger"





Member since:
2006-02-01
And because they don't ? We are in 2011, not 2006. And since then, Apple has launched the appstore, first for iphone, and now for all their computers. And Apple is restricting purchases on their device to purchase made on the appstore. They have not taken the step to firewall web shops, but they do block application that allow to buy directly from the application instead of using the appstore: http://www.splatf.com/2011/07/kindle-screenshots/ .
And Microsoft is taking that road. Google does not (yet), because google's revenue model is based on advertisement.