Linked by David Adams on Mon 19th Dec 2011 17:05 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 500541
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If Oracle says that JRE 1.7 is based in OpenJDK, then JRE 1.7 should not work with some legacy apps too.
That means they have broken the legacy, not that they removed Java license from Ubuntu to screw up consumers.
The question may be. How different are the binaries of OpenJDK against Oracle Java 7 JRE?
If Oracle says that JRE 1.7 is based in OpenJDK, then JRE 1.7 should not work with some legacy apps too.
That means they have broken the legacy, not that they removed Java license from Ubuntu to screw up consumers.
The question may be. How different are the binaries of OpenJDK against Oracle Java 7 JRE?
That means they have broken the legacy, not that they removed Java license from Ubuntu to screw up consumers.
The question may be. How different are the binaries of OpenJDK against Oracle Java 7 JRE?
Actually, that is exactly what they did. I'm running Windows 7, and have Java 7 JRE installed. While it doesn't crash nearly as often as the OpenJDK on Linux, there are numerous Java applications (the sections of LibreOffice coded in Java come to mind) that are highly unstable on it.




Member since:
2006-05-09
My Java app running on top of the OpenJDK crashed when doing some things using JNI, but the same app used to run as wanted in a Sun JDK environment. So... yes, there are incompatibilities.