Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Jan 2012 19:12 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source Late last year, president Obama signed a law that makes it possible to indefinitely detain terrorist suspects without any form of trial or due process. Peaceful protesters in Occupy movements all over the world have been labelled as terrorists by the authorities. Initiatives like SOPA promote diligent monitoring of communication channels. Thirty years ago, when Richard Stallman launched the GNU project, and during the three decades that followed, his sometimes extreme views and peculiar antics were ridiculed and disregarded as paranoia - but here we are, 2012, and his once paranoid what-ifs have become reality.
Thread beginning with comment 501856
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Put your work where your mouth is.
by emilsedgh on Mon 2nd Jan 2012 21:13 UTC
emilsedgh
Member since:
2007-06-21

"This is why you should support Linux, even if you use Windows. This is why you should support Apache, even if you run IIS."

If you want to truly support the Free Software Movement, the least you could do is actually using it.

'I support free software but iphone applications are more fun' or 'I like Linux but Windows works-for-me' means nothing.

Im not saying we all should be as extreme as rms. Noone could be as extreme as him.We sometimes need to get some job done. But least we could do is giving up on some features of propertiary softwares.

Reply Score: 10

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

There are others way to support Free and open software, other than using it (which sometimes isn't an option). This "use it or sod off" attitude really isn't helping Free/open source software.

What helps is educating people about the pros and cons, and then let them decide for themselves. Don't force them. Don't feel morally superior or insult them. It's not their fault they're using the software they like or are accustumed with, so don't act like it is.

The best future is one where Free/open source software and proprietary software push each other to excel, for the benefit of all. We don't need an all-FOSS world; we simply need a world where FOSS is competitive and seen as a real competitor in as many fields as possible - forcing proprietary vendors to be on edge.

Reply Parent Score: 10

grayskull Member since:
2008-02-08

"Could people please not use this list to announce information of no particular interest to the people on the list? Hundreds of thousands of babies are born every day. While the whole phenomenon is menacing, one of them by itself is not newsworthy. Nor is it a difficult achievement—even some fish can do it. (Now, if you were a seahorse, it would be more interesting, since it would be the male that gave birth.)"
RMS

http://edward.oconnor.cx/2005/04/rms

Free Software = Good
Open Source = Good
RMS = Bad

Reply Parent Score: 1

M.Onty Member since:
2009-10-23

There are others way to support Free and open software, other than using it (which sometimes isn't an option). This "use it or sod off" attitude really isn't helping Free/open source software.

What helps is educating people about the pros and cons, and then let them decide for themselves. Don't force them. Don't feel morally superior or insult them. It's not their fault they're using the software they like or are accustumed with, so don't act like it is.

The best future is one where Free/open source software and proprietary software push each other to excel, for the benefit of all. We don't need an all-FOSS world; we simply need a world where FOSS is competitive and seen as a real competitor in as many fields as possible - forcing proprietary vendors to be on edge.


This is appears to be a more nuanced view than that expressed in the article itself. I would recommend appending something of the sort to the article for clarity.

Reply Parent Score: 2

r_a_trip Member since:
2005-07-06

If you want to truly support the Free Software Movement, the least you could do is actually using it.

I agree, but putting money where your mouth is, seems so incredibly hard to do, since convenience is king and features gained fall under the largest possible umbrella of entitlement.

In a few years we will see who are the haves and who are the have-nots.

Edit: added quote.

Edited 2012-01-03 14:11 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3