To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I've always looked for webhosting deals at webhostingtalk.com . It's the biggest forum on the topic (at least it was a few years back, I dont really follow this market much). I used this forum to get good deals on my first shared account, the dedicated box I used to get from LayeredTech and all my VPSes. Go to the "Advertising Forums" section and you'll find offers that are much better than those shown on hosting companies' websites.
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=104 is a sub-forum dedicated to VPS offers.
I've been using cheapvps.co.uk for the past 3 years or so and I'm moderately satisfied - support is slow, but I didn't need them much. Their last offer (http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1089498&highlight=ch...) gets you 512 MB Ram / 16GB disk space for 7 GBP (11 USD). It's in UK, but I'm sure you'll find similar and cheaper offers in the US.
$11 is close enough to nothing to never consider getting a shared hosting account, won't you agree?
Or use Amazon EC2 for free:
http://aws.amazon.com/free/
(Of course, if it is a busy site, then you will need to pay for extra bandwidth charges.)
I am well aware of the amazon EC/S3 services.
The "free" service is just a temporary promotional price to demonstrate the technology.
For loads that won't be running 24/7, then EC2 might be a good deal since you don't pay for the down time. But for always on service, dedicated servers will probably be both cheaper and more powerful.
The smallest EC2 virtual CPU instance still costs almost $800/year full time.
For about the same price, you can get dual core dedicated servers at 1and1 and godaddy (*) which are not only more powerful, but include storage and bandwidth costs which are additional through amazon's service.
I realize we're comparing apples and oranges in a way, but in filling the role transitionally assigned to 24/7 dedicated servers, I found amazon's cloud services to be priced uncompetitively - even more so now that such cheap VPS providers have surfaced (assuming they're not too good to be true).
Never the less, it's a valid option and I do appreciate the link very much.
* Edit: I'm not enduring their service (especially with the recent SOPA controversy), just price comparing.
Edited 2012-01-09 04:35 UTC





Member since:
2011-01-28
OSbunny,
"Er no. Have you seen VPS prices lately? Competition has caused prices to tumble. I have a 512mb ram VPS for $10/m. You can get a 384MB or 256MB ram one for even less."
Can you reveal where you found that price? I haven't found any VPS providers at anywhere close to that price in the US.