Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Jan 2012 17:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 502445
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Mobile Browsers
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sat 7th Jan 2012 02:01
in reply to "RE: Mobile Browsers"
You keep saying that, but my Android phone running Cyanogenmod which is pretty close to stock Android has never gotten the full site by default. Furthermore, its a pain in the but to hit the opt out link every time ( its supposed to stay full for a month, but never more than a browser session).
You keep saying that, but my Android phone running Cyanogenmod which is pretty close to stock Android has never gotten the full site by default. Furthermore, its a pain in the but to hit the opt out link every time ( its supposed to stay full for a month, but never more than a browser session).
Android devices are notoriously hard to detect correctly. Some include the "mobile" identifier and some don't (although it is getting much better as most new ones identify as "Mobile Safari" compatible). I expect what is happening is your browser's UA string does include the mobile flag, but for some reason is not being parsed as an Android device (and thus gets the mobile site by default). I would check to see what your User Agent string actually is:
http://whatsmyuseragent.com/





Member since:
2005-06-29
I read it there occasionally but if I want to post a comment I have to use a spoofed non-mobile user agent. The mobile comment posting just doesn't work for me.
Android, iOS, WP7, etc. get the full OSNews. Only non-capable browsers get the true mobile version of OSNews, but even there there's an opt-out link at the bottom to load the full page instead.