To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As said above, try to take a look at what Asus are doing. In my view of aesthetics, they make some of the prettiest computers out there, yet do not blindly follow Apple's designs. They try a lot of new things, which one may like or not, and they attempt to satisfy a much larger user base than Apple.
Ironically, I believe they also used to manufacture Apple's laptops at some point.
Edited 2012-01-10 08:37 UTC
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/26979.html
It constantly surprises me how many people don't really know what minimalism is. If some people on here would like read some design blogs or books ...
You could have copied the citation directly, I was expecting a link to a website about design:
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
French writer (1900 - 1944)
For me, that's unrelated.
I don't care about pointless complexity and "tuning" gadgets.
I made a musical analogy because musical instruments are really optimised for their purpose.
- A triangle has a good shape for a single note, reproducible, pure.
- There is almost nothing useless in a violin, the weird shape serves difficult requirements : Interesting sound covering evenly several octaves, harmonics for rich chords...
When I see a Macbook Air or that stuff, I'm not impressed by the "perfection" obtained by removing itches.
I see that they had a problem integrating connectors, replacable batteries, ... and, instead of finding clever solutions, they preferred to avoid the problem by removing features, for the sake of a silly quest for ultimate slimness. They crippled their product to respect absurd constraints.
Instead of finding a way to cover many octaves, they gave a shiny triangle.
As always, everyone has his/her tastes, ...
Antoine de Saint exupery also wrote, at the beginning of "The Little Prince", about the way adults never understood his drawings, seeing a hat instead of a boa eating an elephant.
I want to be able to see elephants playing violin.
I think that people understand minimalist design fairly well, it is just that they are doing so in an aesthetic context rather than a functional context. Apple's "buttonless" mouse was aethetically minimalist, in part, because it did away with the visual representation of the button. These computers can be considered visually minimalist because they reduce the number of hard edges (i.e. there are fewer sharp corners to poke your eyes out).
Functional minimalism is something different, but that would be reducing a computer to an appliance. A lot of people don't want that.





Member since:
2006-09-21
The thing is, minimalism sells. I'm guessing that it sells because it is the least likely to offend the taste of consumers, even if it is also the least likely to be aestheically pleasing to most consumers. Think of it this way: there are people who thought that Barbie computers were cute and there are people who craft wooden cases for their computers. While both demographics would probably buy something with a minimalist design, the Barbie girl is unlikely to want the craftsman's delight (and vica versa).
If you want it, then buy a machine that fits those criteria. This computer is definitely meant for someone else. It is likely meant for someone who wants something that they can buy without fretting over details, and will plug their camera or iPod into the computer every few weeks. It isn't meant for people like you or me. They probably don't want what we want either. As long as the market can address the needs of different people, there is nothing wrong with that.