To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Making money on using lock-in tactics and hindering interoperability is indecent towards the end user. It's not illegal, but it's indecent. I sure hope this site doesn't endorse indecent business methods.
Inventing new DRM or vendor lock-in schema can't be called innovation IMO.
Edited 2012-01-19 19:46 UTC
Wrong. They simple don't care to open their stuff for lets say Android. Why should they? They take the risk bringing new stuff to the table and cheap copyist earn with hardware sales at zero risk? That would be really stupid from a business point. It's like Google letting Bing use their page rank.
Apple wants to sell an experience which consists of hardware, software and contents. Why should they let other sell the same experience by letting them harvest the investment Apple put into this? Let's see the Samsung, HTC, Motorola, .. software that produces content for iPads. Oh sorry, there's no such thing. But everybody - especially Google, likes to earn money with the work / content of others.
And now mod me down for being "political OSNews incorrect".
That's not the point. You are buying a book, not Apple experience. Why should my book be tied to any single experience which one would be forced to buy to get the book? Apple acts indecently by bribing education circles with free (money wise) authoring software, but using locked in platform for publishing. There are already a bunch of standard ebook formats, which can be used on any platform. Apple's scorn of open standards is well known, and is clearly apparent in this case too.
Edited 2012-01-20 02:43 UTC




Member since:
2010-06-08
Agreed. MS and Apple are known for using technology for lock in purposes. They hate open standards and interoperability, and follow them only when forced.