Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 24th Oct 2005 04:14 UTC, submitted by Eric
Windows Ars Technica has posted a lengthy article on the new promising Microsoft Command Shell. It looks at MSH from the point of view of both coders and Windows admins.
Thread beginning with comment 50432
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It looks cool
by ma_d on Mon 24th Oct 2005 05:37 UTC
ma_d
Member since:
2005-06-29

It's like a cross between Python and shell, but mostly Python.
I'll have to give it a whirl when the big release comes. It looks like I won't get to make fun of them for their lack of a shell anymore; now I'll have to make comments about their incompatible shell ;) .
Yes, I'm insatiable.

Reply Score: 1

RE: It looks cool
by defile on Mon 24th Oct 2005 10:58 in reply to "It looks cool"
defile Member since:
2005-07-09

If you haven't already, consider giving Services for UNIX (SFU) a try. To me, it's one of the best, free as in beer downloads Microsoft offers. While it doesn't doesn't allow you to leverage Windows specifics (although I use VIM to write VBScript with syntax highlighting ;) , it will give you a very nice shell in Windows (not to mention well integrated access to standard UNIX commands). Especially after a quick visit to www.interopsystems.com. From there you can add BASH, TCSH, ZSH and/or even an OpenSSH server. Crave an X Windows Server with that? http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Xming can help with that too. SFU includes CSH and KSH. If you do a custom install, you can add a complete GNU development environment and perl as well.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: It looks cool
by ma_d on Mon 24th Oct 2005 21:22 in reply to "RE: It looks cool"
ma_d Member since:
2005-06-29

Yes, I'm aware of it. But for me, it'd be a hindrance as my main uses for Windows these days are:
a.) Games
b.) Porting to Windows

It messes up b because then I forget things like the lack of pthreads without SFU.
I end up installing ming though, which also gives you bash and a few development utilities. Usually ming plus emacs (when I can get it to work and don't have to use the inferior xemacs) is good enough for a lite workload.

I do know now to avoid Cygwin though, heh. If it installs, yay. If the install fails, there goes an hour of your life.

Reply Parent Score: 1