Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Jan 2012 15:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504739
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: No MacOS X for me.
by amadensor on Thu 26th Jan 2012 17:41
in reply to "RE[2]: No MacOS X for me."
It is a mix:
1) ARM is Metro only.
2) ARM machines (including low power laptops as well as tablets and phones) are boot loader locked so you cannot swap the OS.
3) Legacy apps can be loaded any way you like, but Metro apps are from the app store only.
So, if you buy a low power ARM laptop (a category that Ed Bott claims doesn't matter since it doesn't exist yet), you can only install Metro apps from the app store, and can not even swap out for Linux if you get sick of it.
I expected Apple to do this first, with the way that iOS went, but I was wrong.
RE[3]: No MacOS X for me.
by n4cer on Fri 27th Jan 2012 04:35
in reply to "RE[2]: No MacOS X for me."
"MS already announced a similar position. Windows 8 Metro applications will be available only through the app store, and cannot be installed by way of untrusted third parties.
I heard that that was just for ARM client Win8, not for x86. Win8 ARM reportedly doesn't let you run non-Metro apps (because they aren't including the desktop interface at all), and as a separate constraint doesn't let you sideload apps from places other than its app store.
On Win8 client for x86 they are including the desktop interface and letting you run apps for it, and are letting you install apps from other locations. They haven't said one way or another whether Metro will run unsigned apps, or whether you will be able to provide signed apps from other places like you can now.
On Win8 server, x86 or not, they haven't said anything about this subject at all. There's a good chance that Win8 server won't get Metro at all, only desktop and the CLI. They certainly will allow at least self-signed apps because most business software is written in-house. "
Metro should be available on Server if you install the full server role with GUI shell, and also available for Remote Desktop clients.
The question was addressed about 47 minutes into this session.
Windows Server 8 apps must run without a GUI - learn more now
http://channel9.msdn.com/events/BUILD/BUILD2011/SAC-416T
It was mentioned that the build of Server that the presenters were using (seemingly the DP) did not include Metro because it was reserved for the Client unveiling, but it would be available in later Server builds.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I heard that that was just for ARM client Win8, not for x86. Win8 ARM reportedly doesn't let you run non-Metro apps (because they aren't including the desktop interface at all), and as a separate constraint doesn't let you sideload apps from places other than its app store.
On Win8 client for x86 they are including the desktop interface and letting you run apps for it, and are letting you install apps from other locations. They haven't said one way or another whether Metro will run unsigned apps, or whether you will be able to provide signed apps from other places like you can now.
On Win8 server, x86 or not, they haven't said anything about this subject at all. There's a good chance that Win8 server won't get Metro at all, only desktop and the CLI. They certainly will allow at least self-signed apps because most business software is written in-house.