Linked by Matthew Johnson on Tue 31st Jan 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 505354
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-04-25
The success of Microsoft through the eighties and nineties and the strength of Clay Christensen's Innovator's Dilemma (which is flawed and in its first incarnation focused too heavily on economic disruption from below, and the commensurate network effects, rather than true innovation) have completely blurred out the true discussion. People are too quick to be reductionist, black-and-white, winner-take-all.
The real question is: What is required to make a platform sustainable? Is there a threshold for market share sustainability? Platform profitability? Development ease, speed, and cost? Are there other network effects beyond masses of users? Etc.
If you can arrive at intelligent answers to these questions, market share becomes less of a focus.