Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Feb 2012 09:58 UTC, submitted by gogothebee
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Jonathan Riddell, lead developer of the Kubuntu project and the only person paid by Canonical to work on the KDE variant of the popular distribution, has announced that after the 12.04 release, Canonical will no longer be funding him, effectively putting Kubuntu on the same level as other Ubuntu variants like Xubuntu.
Thread beginning with comment 506260
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

"Netrunner 4.1 actually looks pretty sweet to me. "

Netrunner is a derivative of Kubuntu so they depend on a healthy Kubuntu the same as Linux Mint KDE does.

It depends on Canonical's repositories, sure. AFAIK one of the few Kubuntu-written packages in those repositories is the Muon package manager. The majority of the work that Kubuntu does, I believe, is to prepare and check the distribution ISOs.

Both Linux Mint KDE and Netrunner do that for their own ISOs.

KDE itself is written by the KDE project team.

Nothing to do with Canonical or Kubuntu.

Having said all this, I'm not actually sure if Kubuntu itself is all that much affected by this development anyway:

For those who have not yet read about it, let me quickly recap the situation. Up until now Kubuntu was a Canonical supported flavor of Ubuntu. This essentially means that you can buy a support contract from Canonical to help you with your Kubuntu infrastructure. Every once in a while Canonical would stamp ‘LTS’ on a Kubuntu release to indicate that they would support this release for 3 or 5 of years to come (delivering security and major bug fixes primarily). The upcoming 12.04 will be the last release for which Canonical offers these services. As a direct consequence Jonathan Riddell, a good friend of mine and fearless leader of Kubuntu, will work on other technology during work hours.

You might have noticed that I was writing a lot about Canonical just now, and the reason for this is that the change mostly is about Canonical and not Kubuntu.
Kubuntu is and always has been a mostly community driven project. To give you an idea what mostly means in this case: out of the 25 people who notably contributed in the past year, 1 person was employed by Canonical to do so (i.e. 4% of general Kubuntu work was financed by Canonical). Please do not get me wrong though. Jonathan is a great developer and does a considerable amount of work, particularly in those areas where the community currently lacks motivation, hence some workflow revision is in order to make the ‘new’ Kubuntu equally efficient.

For a personal, user-owned desktop system, either Netrunner or Linux Mint KDE have possibly better default package selections anyway.

Edited 2012-02-07 23:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: -1

Soulbender Member since:

Good job explaining to the guy who worked on Kubuntu what KDE is....

Reply Parent Score: 9

lemur2 Member since:

Good job explaining to the guy who worked on Kubuntu what KDE is....

jriddell was trying to claim that Linux Mint KDE and Netrunner specifically depended on Kubuntu.

My point was that Linux Mint KDE and Netrunner effectively duplicated most of the work that Kubuntu does. Most of the actual writing of code is upstream from Kubuntu.

If I just straight out said that with no support, it would have no weight against what jriddell said.

So I pointed out where the code was coming from and who does what work to make my case to OSNews readers.

Netrunner and Linux Mint KDE do indeed depend on Canonical repositories for the underlying system infrastructure. Canonical need all that anyway, including Qt now. So even if Kubuntu was completely eradicated from Canonical's repositories, all that Netrunner and Linux Mint KDE would have to do is get the KDE4 source code from, compile it, make sure it worked in conjunction with the infrastructure code from Canonical, and then put it in their own repositories.

Oh, and also take over maintenance of Muon, which IMO is very worthwhile.

Edited 2012-02-09 00:19 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0