Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Feb 2012 19:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 506346
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Speak for yourself. Gnome 3 may not have all the functions of Gnome 2 re-implemented yet, but the core paradigm they're going for has been executed extremely well. 3.0 was the smoothest "point zero" release I've seen in well over a decade of using Linux in one form or another. Most everything that was implemented makes sense within the metaphor they were shooting for. Things flow smoothly if you work with the design instead of trying to bend it into something else that it clearly isn't.
Am I saying everyone should like it? Nope, couldn't give a damn less what the rest of the world uses to be honest. It's all personal preference anyway. What I am saying is people need to learn to look at designs and intents outside of their own personal biases and preferences.