Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Feb 2012 11:39 UTC, submitted by RichterKuato
Thread beginning with comment 508717
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The way KDE does things has hardly any impact on anything, the least on dynamics and uptake of Windows...
And anyway, it is a project which generally follows Windows UI (I don't mean this in a "bad way", that's natural coming largely from places where Gnome-influencing MacOS was less popular, and not wanting to scare people away... too much), one which will probably continue ~failing much more than Windows, Metro or not.




Member since:
2007-08-22
...seriously it will, and I'll draw an example as to why.
KDE4 running in "Desktop" mode works wonderfully on a desktop. And in "netbook" mode it provides a very nice touch screen display. However, the "netbook" mode is absolutely horrendous to use on a system without touch - it really should be called 'touchscreen' mode.
However, KDE4 in either mode still presents applications the same way. They got at least that right, which is more than I can say for Microsoft and Win8. And in that respect, KDE4 in either mode is an absolutely beautiful environment.
So, we can already see from a readily available and deployed platform that using the same exact management functionality does not work on different form factors - which is exactly what MS is trying to do with Win8.
KDE4 was designed with that in mind, and in that respect they have the different modes so that you can adjust to the best mode for your form factor.
Has Microsoft learned nothing?