Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Mar 2012 22:59 UTC
Apple And it was that time of the year again - Apple held one of its product announcements. This one focussed on the iPad mostly, and while some will call it a disappointment merely because virtually everything had already been leaked, I'm still in awe over the fact the newly announced iPad has a 2048x1536 display. My mind is blown.
Thread beginning with comment 510009
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
CPU
by vivainio on Thu 8th Mar 2012 21:11 UTC
vivainio
Member since:
2008-12-26

Apple are great at marketing:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57392624-64/new-ipad-why-quad-cor...

They don't talk about dual core CPU (because that's where they are behind), they talk about quad core gpu (which doesn't mean anything to anyone). Random (semi-savvy) consumer will just see that "ok, this android tablet is quad core, but so is the new ipad".

Reply Score: 4

RE: CPU
by nefer on Thu 8th Mar 2012 21:53 in reply to "CPU"
nefer Member since:
2012-02-15

I think quad core graphics are much more useful than quad core cpus on tablets.

Even on desktops, quad core CPUs are seldomly used to their full extent and more than often the extra cores are left twiddling their thumbs.

It makes much more sense using that SoC real estate to things that DO make a difference, such as graphical performance on a display which is now four times bigger.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: CPU
by Morgan on Fri 9th Mar 2012 07:59 in reply to "RE: CPU"
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

I think quad core graphics are much more useful than quad core cpus on tablets.


I'd say that is generally true, modern tablets use the GPU to draw everything you see on the screen, whereas the CPU usually just handles the background stuff. This is especially obvious on older tablets and e-readers that don't have an accelerated GPU.

Even on desktops, quad core CPUs are seldomly used to their full extent and more than often the extra cores are left twiddling their thumbs.


At my part time job, I use a quad core i5 machine and it's definitely overkill. Though I have had to run a compiler occasionally, I'm not a programmer by trade and I just use Dev-C++ which (to my knowledge) is not optimised for quad cores. On my dual-core AMD at home, however, I get a lot of use out of both cores as I tend to do a lot of movie transcoding and game playing.

It makes much more sense using that SoC real estate to things that DO make a difference, such as graphical performance on a display which is now four times bigger.


I think that alone is why Apple chose to move to a quad core GPU; it may seem like overkill but at least they have the horsepower to push all those pixels and then some. I can imagine the train wreck of trying to support such a resolution on a dual core mobile GPU, given that my Nvidia desktop board at home struggles with 1600x900 in some games.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: CPU
by vivainio on Fri 9th Mar 2012 15:43 in reply to "RE: CPU"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

I think quad core graphics are much more useful than quad core cpus on tablets.


But quad core graphics doesn't mean anything generally.

Do I have 480 core graphics since I have gf gtx 480?

I agree that fast graphics is important, but "quad core graphics" does not mean fast graphics (while quad core cpu generally does mean fast cpu). Does anyone outside Apple talk about quad core graphics?

Reply Parent Score: 2