To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What I don't get is WHY does articles like this get so much press by the Linux community? Is it somehow amazing that if you spend long enough bashing at something you can make it run poorly on anything if you have the source? What's next 'Here is Linux running on a VCR remote!". I mean I can understand why the guy did it for himself, he was bored and didn't have anything better to do with his weekends, i get that, but why give him press for being bored, just because he used some Linux code in his boredom?
Its not like there aren't plenty of really cool smaller projects that could actually be useful that couldn't use the press, heck any quick skim through Freshmeat or Distrowatch will find you a dozen to write about easily. Why write about some guy making Linux take 4+ hours to boot on a toaster? Is that REALLY worth writing about?
The only things worth writing about are the things people enjoy reading about. I, for one, enjoyed reading about it. So, yes, it was worth it. it sounds like you've never doen anything technically interesting but ultimately pointless before . For those of us who have, its really cool to know we aren't alone and there is always some one crazier than us.




Member since:
2006-10-28
At the end of the 90's was a project trying to make Linux run on a 80286, never knew what happen with that.
But if anyone interesting there are another like that: The ELKS Project http://elks.sourceforge.net
Or something really weird Lunix: http://lng.sourceforge.net/
They were able to run a multitasking OS on a C64. And then try (or succeed) to make a Unix like OS.