Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Apr 2012 22:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 513037
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Simple failure to think outside the box? At the time these guys started developing Android, java would have been the language of choice for mobile applications (much bigger share than Windows CE for example), so maybe they just wanted to provide a path of least resistance for developers...
RE[3]: Comment by kovacm
by dsmogor on Fri 6th Apr 2012 10:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kovacm"
RE[3]: Comment by kovacm
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Fri 6th Apr 2012 13:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kovacm"
Remember Andy Rubin also founded Danger the maker of the dangertop/sidekick. Which had an app store and was written in Java. He'd already had success with the ecosystem, it makes sense he'd do it again. And at the time in history Sun was preaching and moving to open source everywhere with all of their products. Android & the rest of the world didn't see the oracle acquisition coming at that point.





Member since:
2008-01-09
I still do not get why they decided to back the Java model and think upgrading from Java ME was such a high priority... I do not dislike Java, but to anyone doing the Java-JNI-Native dance... this is not fun... The more confusing when other Java based approaches like JNA are around and .NET already showed how you could do native code support in a more sane way.... and they would have avoided the Oracle lawsuit too...