Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Apr 2012 21:59 UTC
Google If you ever needed evidence that no, people don't want a browser as an operating system, it's this: Google has updated Chrome OS to pretty much turn it into a traditional desktop operating system. This does raise the question - does anybody actually use Chrome OS?
Thread beginning with comment 513663
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Hmm...
by lucas_maximus on Wed 11th Apr 2012 12:43 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Hmm..."
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

If I had time to much about with those things these days I might as well use on of the BSDs which have a better package and ports systems then Arch and Gentoo combined.

Anyway I thought it was pretty clear that the OP wanted a more popular/easier to use distro.

I've been using Fedora lately and it is pretty solid on everything I have ever thrown it on.

Arch and Gentoo tbh aren't worth the hassle and it is arguable whether they are actually any better.

Edited 2012-04-11 12:46 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Hmm...
by drcouzelis on Wed 11th Apr 2012 13:26 in reply to "RE[5]: Hmm..."
drcouzelis Member since:
2010-01-11

If I had time to much about with those things these days I might as well use on of the BSDs which have a better package and ports systems then Arch and Gentoo combined. Anyway I thought it was pretty clear that the OP wanted a more popular/easier to use distro. I've been using Fedora lately and it is pretty solid on everything I have ever thrown it on. Arch and Gentoo tbh aren't worth the hassle and it is arguable whether they are actually any better.

My personal opinion about Arch Linux is very different from your personal opinion.

If the DistroWatch list has any merit, then Arch Linux is very popular. I suppose Arch Linux was a "hassle" when I installed it two and a half years ago, but hasn't been since then.

As for Arch Linux not being "better" than other options, I wanted to use Linux (for the hardware and software support that I desire) and I wanted rolling release software updates with a good binary-based package manager. For those reasons, Arch Linux is not only a better operating system compared to others, it's the best operating system for me.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Hmm...
by lucas_maximus on Wed 11th Apr 2012 15:12 in reply to "RE[6]: Hmm..."
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

:sigh:

Best operating is subjective.

If you like pissing about with configuration files to get a working system, go for it.

I can't be bothered with that crap any more, if it doesn't work out of the box, I am not interested.

I know how to do it, I just rather do other things.

Edited 2012-04-11 15:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: Hmm...
by aliquis on Wed 11th Apr 2012 20:00 in reply to "RE[6]: Hmm..."
aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

Arse Linux ... It's all in the name.

Reply Parent Score: 2