Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I'm pretty sure that taking something, giving nothing back for it, yet still charging downstream recipients for essentially that same thing re-packaged, could be considered the definition of selfish.
The same thing happens to any BSD code that is forked and GPLd, any modifications to the fork are under the GPL and can't be backported to the original BSD code.
I would say that was selfish as well, using the your same logic. "
As a person who tends towards GPL for pragmatic purposes, I say your scenario does illustrate selfishness. There is no denying it. It's taking advantage of an unequal situation.
But that is the risk you run of licensing your code using BSD. If you don't like it, license your code under some other license. That's why people like me would choose the GPL. I don't like being taken advantage of, even though I like having opened code.
Altruism only works if it is reciprocated.




Member since:
2009-08-18
The same thing happens to any BSD code that is forked and GPLd, any modifications to the fork are under the GPL and can't be backported to the original BSD code.
I would say that was selfish as well, using the your same logic.
Edited 2012-04-22 09:24 UTC