Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Apr 2012 02:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 515874
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The flaw with these things is that they get voted on.
This.
This award doesn't reward the most innovative person. It rewards the celebrities. Alan Turing or Tim Berners-Lee deserve an award a lot more, but since they aren't as well known to the general public, as someone who creates consumer products and appears in ads, they didnt get it.
On the other hand, the fact that they didn't get it, just means that the award is worthless.




Member since:
2007-02-18
The flaw with these things is that they get voted on.
What we really need is to develop a graph of technology with the nodes being specific discoveries and inventions and the edges being a "lead to" relationship between nodes.
The person with the most nodes and weighted by the number of outgoing edges from those nodes is the winner of life.
The person whose nodes have a balanced ratio of outgoing edges with incoming edges (with an above average number of outgoing edges) is the winner of innovation.
The person who uses patents to eliminate competition disqualifies themselves.